[
  {
    "notice": "只有 title 和 text 字段是必填，其他字段可删除不填。填写时，请从第三条数据开始填写，第二条数据是示例，填写完成之后，不要删除前面两条",
    "notice1": "只有 title 和 text 字段是必填，其他字段可删除不填。填写时，请从第三条数据开始填写，第二条数据是示例，填写完成之后，不要删除前面两条",
    "notice2": "只有 title 和 text 字段是必填，其他字段可删除不填。填写时，请从第三条数据开始填写，第二条数据是示例，填写完成之后，不要删除前面两条",
    "title": "这里填标题，必填必填必填必填必填必填必填必填必填必填必填必填必填必填必填必填必填必填必填必填",
    "titleTranslate": "这里填标题翻译",
    "text": "这里填原文，一句一个换行符，一段两个换行符，必填必填必填必填必填必填必填必填必填必填必填必填必填必填必填必填必填必填必填必填",
    "textTranslate": "这里填原文翻译，一句一个换行符，一段两个换行符",
    "audioSrc": "这里填音频的url/在线地址"
  },
  {
    "title": "How are you today?",
    "titleTranslate": "今天好吗？",
    "text": "STEVEN:Hello, HELEN.\n\nHELEN:Hi, Steven.\n\nSTEVEN:How are you today?\n\nHELEN:I'm very well, thank you. And you?\n\nSTEVEN:I'm fine, thanks.\n\nSTEVEN:How is Tony?\n\nHELEN:He's fine, thanks. How's Emma?\n\nSTEVEN:She's very well, too, Helen.\n\nSTEVEN:Goodbye, Helen.Nice to see you.\n\nHELEN:Nice to see you, too, Steven. Goodbye.",
    "textTranslate": "史蒂文：你好，海伦 \n\n海 伦：你好，史蒂文 \n\n史蒂文：你今天好吗？ \n\n海 伦：很好，谢谢你。你好吗？ \n\n史蒂文：很好，谢谢。 \n\n史蒂文：托尼好吗？ \n\n海 伦：他很好，谢谢。埃玛好吗？ \n\n史蒂文：她也很好，海伦。 \n\n史蒂文：再见，海伦。见到你真高兴。 \n\n海 伦：我见到你也很高兴，史蒂文。再见。",
    "audioSrc": "/sound/article/nce1/009&010－How Are You Today.mp3"
  },
  {
    "title": "05A Asking a Question That Gets a Useful Answer",
    "titleTranslate": "第05课A｜提问与确认理解",
    "text": "A useful question gives the other person enough information to understand what I know and what I still need to learn.\nIf I only ask whether something works, the answer may be too general to help me make the next decision.\nI try to identify the specific uncertainty, such as where a setting is stored or how a service receives a request.\nThen I explain the context in one or two sentences and ask the question that matters for the current task.\nFor example, I might ask whether rebuilding a container will remove the settings that I saved during the previous session.\nThis question names the action, the information at risk, and the situation in which I need an accurate answer.\nIf the explanation contains unfamiliar language, I ask for a concrete example instead of pretending that I understand every detail.\nI can also repeat the main idea in simpler words and ask the other person to confirm whether my understanding is correct.\nA short conversation often becomes more productive when both people agree on the meaning of a few important terms.\nThe goal is to reduce uncertainty enough to act responsibly, rather than collect explanations that do not affect the next step.",
    "textTranslate": "有效的问题会提供足够信息，让对方知道我已懂什么、还需要了解什么。\n如果只问某个东西是否能用，回答可能太泛，无法帮助下一步决定。\n我会明确具体疑点，比如设置存在哪里，或服务如何接收请求。\n然后用一两句解释背景，并提出与当前任务相关的问题。\n例如我会问，重新构建容器会不会删除上次保存的设置。\n这个问题说明了动作、可能受影响的信息，以及需要准确回答的情境。\n解释中出现陌生表达时，我会要求具体例子，不假装理解全部细节。\n我也可以用简单话重述重点，请对方确认理解是否正确。\n双方就几个重要术语含义达成一致后，简短对话往往更有效。\n目标是减少不确定性，以便负责任地行动，而不只是收集无关解释。"
  },
  {
    "title": "05B Checking What Someone Means",
    "titleTranslate": "第05课B｜提问与确认理解",
    "text": "Sometimes an answer appears clear because it uses familiar words, but those words can refer to different things in different projects.\nIf someone says that the update is ready, I need to know whether it is ready for review, testing, or public use.\nI can ask a direct question, such as whether the new version has been deployed to the production environment.\nI can also ask what remains unfinished and who is expected to make the next decision before work can continue.\nThese questions prevent a small difference in interpretation from becoming a larger problem later in the process.\nWhen I request an explanation, I keep the embedded question in ordinary statement order, even if the original question uses inversion.\nFor example, I say that I want to understand how the system works, rather than putting does before its subject.\nA useful answer should distinguish what has been observed from what is still an assumption or a possible explanation.\nIf the evidence is incomplete, it is reasonable to ask what needs to be checked before we reach a firm conclusion.\nClear questions and careful confirmation help me learn the subject while keeping the project moving in a practical direction.\nThat shared understanding makes the next action more deliberate.",
    "textTranslate": "有时回答用了熟悉词，看起来清楚，但不同项目里的含义可能不同。\n有人说更新好了，我需要知道是可审阅、可测试，还是可公开使用。\n我可以直接问，新版本是否已经部署到生产环境。\n也可以问还剩什么，以及谁应在继续之前作下一步决定。\n这些问题避免小小的理解差异在后续变成大问题。\n要求解释时，即使原问题有疑问语序，嵌入的问题仍用陈述语序。\n例如我说想理解系统怎样运作，不把does放在从句主语前。\n有用回答应区分已经观察到的内容，与仍是假设或可能解释的内容。\n证据不完整时，可以问得出明确结论前还需检查什么。\n清晰提问和仔细确认让我边学边把项目推向可行方向。\n共同理解让下一动作更审慎。"
  },
  {
    "title": "05C Working Conversation",
    "titleTranslate": "第05课C｜提问与确认理解",
    "text": "Me: Could you explain where the application saves its settings and whether those settings will remain after the container is rebuilt?\nAssistant: Some settings are stored in the database, while local files may be stored inside the container unless a volume is configured.\nMe: I understand the general difference, but could you give me a concrete example using the configuration that this project actually has?\nAssistant: Yes; first we should inspect the volume configuration and identify the files that the application writes during an ordinary session.\nMe: So rebuilding does not automatically tell us whether the saved data will survive; the storage location determines that result, correct?\nAssistant: Correct; we need to check the actual storage arrangement rather than assume that every file is either persistent or temporary.\nMe: Please explain what you find in simple terms, and distinguish the confirmed facts from anything that still needs another check.\nAssistant: I will summarize the relevant settings, show one concrete example, and explain the next step before suggesting any change.",
    "textTranslate": "我：能解释应用把设置存在哪里，以及重建容器后设置是否保留吗？\n助手：部分设置在数据库里；如果没有配置数据卷，本地文件可能在容器内部。\n我：我理解大致区别，能按本项目实际配置举个具体例子吗？\n助手：可以，先检查数据卷配置，确定应用平时会写哪些文件。\n我：也就是说，重建本身不能决定数据是否保留，存储位置才决定结果，对吗？\n助手：对，需要检查实际存储安排，不能假设所有文件都持久或临时。\n我：请用简单话解释发现，并区分已确认事实和还需检查的内容。\n助手：我会总结相关设置、举例，并在建议改动前解释下一步。"
  },
  {
    "title": "05D Sentence Review",
    "titleTranslate": "第05课D｜提问与确认理解",
    "text": "A useful question gives the other person enough information to understand what I know and what I still need to learn.\nI try to identify the specific uncertainty, such as where a setting is stored or how a service receives a request.\nFor example, I might ask whether rebuilding a container will remove the settings that I saved during the previous session.\nI can also repeat the main idea in simpler words and ask the other person to confirm whether my understanding is correct.\nSometimes an answer appears clear because it uses familiar words, but those words can refer to different things in different projects.\nI can ask a direct question, such as whether the new version has been deployed to the production environment.\nWhen I request an explanation, I keep the embedded question in ordinary statement order, even if the original question uses inversion.\nIf the evidence is incomplete, it is reasonable to ask what needs to be checked before we reach a firm conclusion.\nCould you explain where the application saves its settings and whether those settings will remain after the container is rebuilt?\nI understand the general difference, but could you give me a concrete example using the configuration that this project actually has?\nSo rebuilding does not automatically tell us whether the saved data will survive; the storage location determines that result, correct?\nPlease explain what you find in simple terms, and distinguish the confirmed facts from anything that still needs another check.",
    "textTranslate": "有效的问题会提供足够信息，让对方知道我已懂什么、还需要了解什么。\n我会明确具体疑点，比如设置存在哪里，或服务如何接收请求。\n例如我会问，重新构建容器会不会删除上次保存的设置。\n我也可以用简单话重述重点，请对方确认理解是否正确。\n有时回答用了熟悉词，看起来清楚，但不同项目里的含义可能不同。\n我可以直接问，新版本是否已经部署到生产环境。\n要求解释时，即使原问题有疑问语序，嵌入的问题仍用陈述语序。\n证据不完整时，可以问得出明确结论前还需检查什么。\n我：能解释应用把设置存在哪里，以及重建容器后设置是否保留吗？\n我：我理解大致区别，能按本项目实际配置举个具体例子吗？\n我：也就是说，重建本身不能决定数据是否保留，存储位置才决定结果，对吗？\n我：请用简单话解释发现，并区分已确认事实和还需检查的内容。"
  },
  {
    "title": "05E Vocabulary in Context",
    "titleTranslate": "第05课E｜提问与确认理解",
    "text": "Keep me informed of important changes, but ignore information that does not affect the current decision.\nIf the info is unclear, ask another question and give the other person time to explain the nature of the problem.\nA concrete example can help me figure out which detail matters before I ask a more focused question.\nI answered the first question, but several questions remained unanswered because the necessary evidence was absent.\nThe answers should explain the relevant context and indicate when an unknown detail needs another check.\nClarifying the meaning of a term prevents confusion when the same word represents different ideas in different contexts.\nThe result indicates a problem, but it does not identify the cause without additional analysis.\nI am curious about the design, but I need to distinguish an interesting question from an urgent requirement.\nI could not fathom the explanation until someone gave me a concrete example with ordinary numbers.\nThe listener asked for a succinct answer rather than a substantial collection of loosely related facts.\nA tip may be helpful, but a thorough explanation should clarify the reasoning behind it.",
    "textTranslate": "请告诉我重要变化，无关当前决定的信息可忽略。\n信息不清就再问，并给对方时间解释问题性质。\n具体例子帮助我弄清哪个细节重要，再提出更聚焦的问题。\n我答了首问，但缺证据，几个问题仍未答。\n答案应解释背景，并说明未知细节何时需再查。\n澄清术语含义，可防止同一词在不同语境代表不同概念而混淆。\n结果表明有问题，但没有进一步分析不能定位原因。\n我好奇设计，但需区分有趣问题与紧急需求。\n直到有人给普通数字的具体例子，我才理解说明。\n听者要求简明答案，而非一大堆松散相关事实。\n提示有帮助，但细致说明应解释背后推理。"
  }
]