[
  {
    "notice": "只有 title 和 text 字段是必填，其他字段可删除不填。填写时，请从第三条数据开始填写，第二条数据是示例，填写完成之后，不要删除前面两条",
    "notice1": "只有 title 和 text 字段是必填，其他字段可删除不填。填写时，请从第三条数据开始填写，第二条数据是示例，填写完成之后，不要删除前面两条",
    "notice2": "只有 title 和 text 字段是必填，其他字段可删除不填。填写时，请从第三条数据开始填写，第二条数据是示例，填写完成之后，不要删除前面两条",
    "title": "这里填标题，必填必填必填必填必填必填必填必填必填必填必填必填必填必填必填必填必填必填必填必填",
    "titleTranslate": "这里填标题翻译",
    "text": "这里填原文，一句一个换行符，一段两个换行符，必填必填必填必填必填必填必填必填必填必填必填必填必填必填必填必填必填必填必填必填",
    "textTranslate": "这里填原文翻译，一句一个换行符，一段两个换行符",
    "audioSrc": "这里填音频的url/在线地址"
  },
  {
    "title": "How are you today?",
    "titleTranslate": "今天好吗？",
    "text": "STEVEN:Hello, HELEN.\n\nHELEN:Hi, Steven.\n\nSTEVEN:How are you today?\n\nHELEN:I'm very well, thank you. And you?\n\nSTEVEN:I'm fine, thanks.\n\nSTEVEN:How is Tony?\n\nHELEN:He's fine, thanks. How's Emma?\n\nSTEVEN:She's very well, too, Helen.\n\nSTEVEN:Goodbye, Helen.Nice to see you.\n\nHELEN:Nice to see you, too, Steven. Goodbye.",
    "textTranslate": "史蒂文：你好，海伦 \n\n海 伦：你好，史蒂文 \n\n史蒂文：你今天好吗？ \n\n海 伦：很好，谢谢你。你好吗？ \n\n史蒂文：很好，谢谢。 \n\n史蒂文：托尼好吗？ \n\n海 伦：他很好，谢谢。埃玛好吗？ \n\n史蒂文：她也很好，海伦。 \n\n史蒂文：再见，海伦。见到你真高兴。 \n\n海 伦：我见到你也很高兴，史蒂文。再见。",
    "audioSrc": "/sound/article/nce1/009&010－How Are You Today.mp3"
  },
  {
    "title": "06A Choosing Between Two Reasonable Options",
    "titleTranslate": "第06课A｜比较方案并作决定",
    "text": "Choosing a solution is easier when I compare it against a clear goal instead of looking for the most impressive technology.\nSuppose that I need a small tool for personal use and have two reasonable ways to build the first version.\nThe first option offers more features, but it requires additional setup and creates more work whenever I need to update it.\nThe second option is simpler, easier to understand, and less expensive to maintain, although it has a few limitations.\nBefore deciding, I compare the cost, the expected workload, and the tasks that each option actually allows me to complete.\nI also ask whether the additional features solve a current problem or merely create possibilities that I may never use.\nFor this project, a smaller solution may be the better choice because I value clarity and a short path to useful results.\nThat does not make the larger option wrong; it means that it fits a different set of requirements and priorities.\nAfter choosing, I write down the reason so that a future change in direction can be compared with the original decision.\nA good comparison helps me make a deliberate choice without pretending that one approach is always best for every situation.",
    "textTranslate": "把方案与明确目标比较，比寻找最炫技术更容易作决定。\n假设我需要个人使用的小工具，有两种合理方式制作初版。\n第一个方案功能更多，但需要额外配置，每次更新工作量也更大。\n第二个更简单、更易理解、维护更便宜，不过也有限制。\n决定前，我比较成本、预期工作量，以及各方案实际能完成的任务。\n也会问，额外功能解决当前问题，还是只提供未必会用的可能性。\n这个项目里，小方案可能更好，因为我重视清晰和快速取得实用结果。\n这不代表大方案错误，只说明它适合另一组需求和优先级。\n选定后记录理由，以便日后改变方向时与最初决定比较。\n良好比较帮助我审慎选择，而不假装某种方法在所有场景都最好。"
  },
  {
    "title": "06B Explaining Why I Prefer One Approach",
    "titleTranslate": "第06课B｜比较方案并作决定",
    "text": "When I recommend an approach, I want the explanation to show a useful trade-off rather than express an unsupported personal preference.\nSaying that the second version is better is not enough unless I explain which goal it serves more effectively.\nFor example, the second layout may make the main action easier to find while using fewer cards and less introductory text.\nIt may also work better on a narrow screen, even if the first version looks more dramatic on a large display.\nThese observations give the team something concrete to discuss and help us avoid arguing only about whether a design feels modern.\nI can say that I prefer the second option because it matches the existing navigation and reduces the number of decisions.\nIf someone disagrees, I ask which requirement they think deserves more attention and whether an example can clarify the difference.\nSometimes the best result combines a useful part of each approach, but that combination still needs to remain coherent and manageable.\nThe purpose of comparison is to support a decision, so I eventually choose an option and explain the next practical step.\nI can reconsider later if new evidence appears, without treating every small uncertainty as a reason to delay the whole project.",
    "textTranslate": "推荐方案时，我希望解释有用的取舍，而不是没有依据的个人偏好。\n说第二版更好不够，还得说明它更有效地满足哪个目标。\n例如第二种布局用更少卡片和介绍文字，让主要操作更容易找到。\n它可能在窄屏效果更好，虽然第一版大屏看起来更有冲击力。\n这些观察让团队有具体讨论依据，避免只争论设计是否现代。\n我可以说偏好第二方案，因为它匹配现有导航并减少决策数量。\n有人不同意时，我会问哪个需求值得更多关注，以及能否举例澄清差别。\n有时最佳结果结合两种方案的优点，但组合仍需连贯且可管理。\n比较是为了支持决定，所以最终应选定方案并说明实际下一步。\n新证据出现后可以重新考虑，不必因每个小疑点拖延整个项目。"
  },
  {
    "title": "06C Working Conversation",
    "titleTranslate": "第06课C｜比较方案并作决定",
    "text": "Designer: I have prepared two layouts; the first shows more information immediately, while the second gives the main action more space.\nMe: Could you compare them on mobile as well, because most visitors may use the page on a narrow screen during a break?\nDesigner: On mobile, the second version has fewer cards and less text, so the first useful action is easier to find.\nMe: I prefer that option, but I would like to keep the short example from the first design because it explains the product.\nDesigner: That combination should work; would you like me to update the preview before we apply the same layout to the other pages?\nMe: Yes, please show one complete example first, and explain any limitations that become visible when the content is longer than expected.\nDesigner: I will prepare that version and compare it with the original using the same content, screen size, and main user task.\nMe: Good; if the new version is clearer, we can choose it and record why it is the better fit for this project.",
    "textTranslate": "设计者：我准备了两种布局，第一种立即展示更多信息，第二种给主要操作更多空间。\n我：也能比较移动端吗，访客可能多在休息时用窄屏查看。\n设计者：移动端第二版卡片和文字更少，更容易找到首个有用操作。\n我：我喜欢那个方案，但想保留第一版的简短例子，因为它解释产品。\n设计者：可以结合，其他页面应用相同布局前，要先更新预览吗？\n我：请先展示一个完整例子，并解释内容超长时暴露的限制。\n设计者：我会准备该版，并用相同内容、屏幕和主要任务与原版比较。\n我：好，如果新版更清晰就选它，并记录为何更适合本项目。"
  },
  {
    "title": "06D Sentence Review",
    "titleTranslate": "第06课D｜比较方案并作决定",
    "text": "Choosing a solution is easier when I compare it against a clear goal instead of looking for the most impressive technology.\nThe first option offers more features, but it requires additional setup and creates more work whenever I need to update it.\nBefore deciding, I compare the cost, the expected workload, and the tasks that each option actually allows me to complete.\nThat does not make the larger option wrong; it means that it fits a different set of requirements and priorities.\nWhen I recommend an approach, I want the explanation to show a useful trade-off rather than express an unsupported personal preference.\nFor example, the second layout may make the main action easier to find while using fewer cards and less introductory text.\nI can say that I prefer the second option because it matches the existing navigation and reduces the number of decisions.\nThe purpose of comparison is to support a decision, so I eventually choose an option and explain the next practical step.\nI have prepared two layouts; the first shows more information immediately, while the second gives the main action more space.\nOn mobile, the second version has fewer cards and less text, so the first useful action is easier to find.\nThat combination should work; would you like me to update the preview before we apply the same layout to the other pages?\nI will prepare that version and compare it with the original using the same content, screen size, and main user task.",
    "textTranslate": "把方案与明确目标比较，比寻找最炫技术更容易作决定。\n第一个方案功能更多，但需要额外配置，每次更新工作量也更大。\n决定前，我比较成本、预期工作量，以及各方案实际能完成的任务。\n这不代表大方案错误，只说明它适合另一组需求和优先级。\n推荐方案时，我希望解释有用的取舍，而不是没有依据的个人偏好。\n例如第二种布局用更少卡片和介绍文字，让主要操作更容易找到。\n我可以说偏好第二方案，因为它匹配现有导航并减少决策数量。\n比较是为了支持决定，所以最终应选定方案并说明实际下一步。\n设计者：我准备了两种布局，第一种立即展示更多信息，第二种给主要操作更多空间。\n设计者：移动端第二版卡片和文字更少，更容易找到首个有用操作。\n设计者：可以结合，其他页面应用相同布局前，要先更新预览吗？\n设计者：我会准备该版，并用相同内容、屏幕和主要任务与原版比较。"
  },
  {
    "title": "06E Vocabulary in Context",
    "titleTranslate": "第06课E｜比较方案并作决定",
    "text": "The price is listed per month, and the comparison should include a pair of examples with matching requirements.\nA trade-off may improve speed while reducing flexibility, so a detailed breakdown is more useful than one impressive number.\nThe quick comparison includes cost, time, and practical limitations, rather than only a ranking based on popularity.\nBudgeting helps us estimate the resources required before we accept an additional piece of work.\nThe alternative scheme reduces repeated decisions, but it involves a different arrangement of shared responsibilities.\nThere are several cases where the simpler approach fits, and one case where it does not.\nThe two publications offer different rates, so the cheaper placement is not automatically the more useful choice.\nThe selection score should reflect the agreed priorities rather than reward a feature merely because it is new.\nThe figures suggest a fair comparison, but we should check whether the samples represent the same workload.\nA bond issued at par is priced at its face value; this finance expression is a specialist extension, not a core project phrase.",
    "textTranslate": "价格按月列示，比较应含一对需求匹配的例子。\n取舍可提速却降灵活性，因此详细分解比单个漂亮数字有用。\n快速比较包括成本、时间和限制，不只按人气排名。\n编制预算帮助我们在接受额外工作前估算资源。\n替代方案减少重复决定，但涉及不同职责安排。\n简化方案适合几个案例，也有一个不适合。\n两家刊物报价不同，更便宜的位置不自动更有用。\n选择评分应体现约定优先级，而非仅因功能新就加分。\n数字看似公平，但要查样本工作量是否相同。\n债券按面值发行称at par，这是金融补充表达，非核心项目用语。"
  }
]